<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sharing Thoughts on Money Matters, Websites, Domains, Marketing, Trading, Real Estate &#38; Personal Matters &#187; Domain Sales &amp; Prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidgreen.com/category/domains-websites/domain-sales-prices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidgreen.com</link>
	<description>Resource Guide about Investing &#38; Making-Money, Domains &#38; Websites...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:22:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Sales; Numbers Game with Timing &amp; Luck</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/domain-sales-a-numbers-game-with-timing-luck/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/domain-sales-a-numbers-game-with-timing-luck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain NAme Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales Plaforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains/Websites for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website for sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[End-user (non-domainer) sales is little more than a numbers game involving timing and luck.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can judge very little if any significance to value based on the number or frequency of sales inquiries.</p>
<p>Assuming you have good keyword names it involves mostly a matter of timing and luck to get end-user offers and sales. Depends on if a business is in need of a name at a particular moment in time and somehow stumbles across your domain which would benefit from its keyword match. </p>
<p>You can own excellent keyword names which are niche dominating and category killer names but never get an offer over many years or possibly get occasional lowball offers (which lowballs come mostly from domainers or non-serious end-users).</p>
<p>When you read dnjournal.com you may think the vast majority of names had sold for far more than what they are worth. In fact, many names which sold for high amounts may look like reg fee names or domains you would not pay anything more than $100 for but they sold for $1000s.</p>
<p>End-user (non-domainer) sales is little more than a numbers game involving timing and luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/domain-sales-a-numbers-game-with-timing-luck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hart to Hart by Frank Schilling</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/hart-to-hart-by-frank-schilling/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/hart-to-hart-by-frank-schilling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 17:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adminst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Name PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain NAme Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales Plaforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales Venues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What this industry needs is a similar productivity miracle in name-sales marketing. So many buyers out there have no idea how to go about buying a better name. They don’t understand the value proposition, or they want a better brand but don’t understand the clerical process of getting to the point where they can put their new, shiny, better name on their business card. I am working for changes in the way we market our names. I can imagine a day in the not too distant future when domains entered into the front door algorythmic search-box at Google, Yahoo, Bing return a one-box result offering to help buy the name in exchange for a percentage of namesales revenue to the search engine that closes the deal.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been watching lots of 1970’s TV lately. My kids really dig those easy-to-follow storylines and I love the trip down memory lane. What’s most interesting from a grown-up’s perspective is how the value of money has changed over the passage of time. A million used to be a big number in the days when Jonathan Hart flew his Gulfstream II to play poker with oil sheiks and generals. $25,000 a year was a salary that put you in the top 10%. Mr. Hart had earned his lifestyle by becoming an industrialist and self-made “millionaire”</p>
<div align="center"> <img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/harttohart.jpg" width="100" height="150" border="0" alt="hart to hart"></a></div>
<p>Yesterday’s million has given way to today’s trillion and a trillion is 1 million times the size of Mr. Hart’s million. I may be an economics dropout, but my street-smarts remind me to trust the words of Abe Lincoln: “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.” Abe’s turn of phrase, reminds me not be lulled into suspension of common sense, as we hear about the next trillion dollar bailout and how it will magically return us to the land of growth and normalcy from whence we came just 7-years ago.</p>
<p>I was living in Lyford-Cay in the Bahamas 7 years ago, in the wake of Hurricane Ivan. It’s a stepford, gate guarded compound of homes and club-buildings on the western tip of New-Providence, filled with old money, country club, trust-fund types. Nice place to visit but I wouldn’t want to live there. One beautiful night my friend, the CEO of a major bank, who had helped arranged my temporary stay, called me to go running. He waved his arm across the twinkling star filled horizon toward a group of luxury villas: “All these people are broke Frank .. They are not productive and their wealth is slipping away without them knowing it”. </p>
<p>What’s more apparent today than at the time of that prescient comment 7 years ago, is that in inflation adjusted terms, most of us are working harder for less. Forget the number on your PPC stats page or the price you just garnered for that 5 figure name-sale, those dollars, euro, yen and francs you’re bringing home are buying less of what they would have bought 7 years ago. My friend had started his banking career in Countries outside the modern financial system. Brazil, Argentina and Africa taught him how fragile the global financial system could be and what it was like when the coveted “system” fails. He felt chastened by the sudden increase in the price of commodities and particularly, gold (the world’s universal currency) which had risen from the $300’s an ounce to the high $400’s in a very short time.</p>
<p>My friend turned his conversation from our neighbors who’s collective millions were quietly losing value, to my domain names &#8211; “How much are all your domain names worth if you have to break up the portfolio and sell each, one at a time?”. Hmmm… If I sold 10% of my portfolio and slashed prices 70%, burning the furniture to get the job done, I could probably raise about $250,000,000. He laughed at the number as it seemed implausibly large in 2004. “How long will it take you at this pace to sell them all?” Some quick fingertip math revealed that I’d get around to clearing my last great .com sale around the time I blew out the candles on my 190th birthday. Time my friends, is still the most valuable commodity. The last 7 years of money printing may have staved off an economic collapse and served to make the implausible “dollar” value of our collective portfolios seem fair, but no amount of printing can bring back the most precious commodity, the 7 years we all lost.</p>
<p>What we really need in the domain name business is a “productivity miracle”. A quote attributed to Alan Greenspan, I first grasped the concept of the productivity miracle during an afternoon in Cayman when a group of visitors, lay on the beach in front of the Ritz. This vacation scene unfolded out the window of my office where I had an incredibly good day domaining. Without my scripts, servers, and skills I would have needed 50 of those vacationers (and then some) to accomplish what I did that day. I added permanent value to my business, while those strangers lapped up Vitamin D and umbrella drinks. You have all experienced similar days. I “was” the productivity miracle that day. Without the productivity miracle of computers, software and programming it may have taken me a month to accomplish what I did &#8211; and I’d have missed tomorrow’s opportunities because I would never have had tomorrow free.</p>
<p>I continue to witness the productivity miracle in the office here in Cayman when John runs our monthly renewal list in 20 minutes, or when he gets the unlocks and authcodes for names and I run the bulk transfer script to move names over to our registrar. I see it when Ryan tweaks the traffic program and Roy and Ying roll out sales-site enhancements. I see it at InternetTraffic.com when each of you post your daily add-lists which come in like a never-ending river of opportunity for each of you. It’s heartbreakingly beautiful to watch the collective productivity of all our people and partners. All that mental horsepower (which is already focused), getting re-focused via our system. It would take all the people walking on the beach today to properly handle the hundreds of sales inquiries that the automated domainnamesales.com platform handled last night.</p>
<p>What this industry needs is a similar productivity miracle in name-sales marketing. So many buyers out there have no idea how to go about buying a better name. They don’t understand the value proposition, or they want a better brand but don’t understand the clerical process of getting to the point where they can put their new, shiny, better name on their business card. I am working for changes in the way we market our names. I can imagine a day in the not too distant future when domains entered into the front door algorythmic search-box at Google, Yahoo, Bing return a one-box result offering to help buy the name in exchange for a percentage of namesales revenue to the search engine that closes the deal.</p>
<p>Google would clearly have a massive tactical advantage with an established one-box product and their search footprint. Name-sales are a multibillion dollar annual business, and there are hundreds of millions of dollars in annual sales commissions for helping users facilitate the purchase of names &#8211; and billions more waiting for the party that helps those users create hosting relationships, signing certificates, email, etc. In a perverse way it may be New TLDs which spearhead the marketing push in premium domain names. As more people take up the opportunity to buy new names at registration price, the more those people will be able to identify the good names from the bad ones – and the more they will covet those better ones.</p>
<p>Well, a million may not be what it used to, but the million-plus names on our platform and millions of daily unique visitors they deliver are certainly appreciated here folks. So much so, that this month we intend to pass along our next rev-share tier payout to our partners. It’s the reason your wires will be just a smidge larger than the report number in your stats this month.</p>
<p>As our monetization platform has grown we’ve seen a large number of naked arbitrage operators try to join us. These are predominantly small accounts, with terrible names, which miraculously get 10,000 uniques a day. We’ve kept those folks at-bay. Arbitrage isn’t a dirty word. We’re all in the arbitrage business in one way or another. When you buy a domain for 10$ per year and sell 13$ per year of traffic, that is an arbitrage play. The type of Arbitrage which troubles us is the kind that changes the characteristics of traffic.</p>
<p>When you buy a piece of traffic from one ad network and sell it to another network for more money you are unknowingly changing the nature of the traffic you bought. Our upstreams have told us that InternetTraffic.com has far fewer traffic quality adjustments than other platforms. We are certain that has much to do with our collective vision regarding arbitrage. Visit an arb-page and click on PPC link after PPC link to get to an advertiser and you’ll see it is a frenetic, “lean back” process which bounces you around quickly, without much effort. When a user types a domain name into their address bar, they assume a much more focused, “lean forward” stance in their chair. The effort that goes into typing a URL and immediately getting your result without changing sites, creates the impression of authority and a more sincere user. It’s a subtlety that translates into greater sale conversions (traffic quality). Time and performance have born these facts out.</p>
<p>When you have type-in domains you are venting light sweet crude from the ground. When you run arbitrage, you are pumping saltwater into the ground to bring the heavy oil up &#8211; or worse, fracking, to get your oil. I would encourage any of you toying with arbitrage on this platform to please move that business to another partner. We have no place for it here. Arbitrage is always there for us. We can always get arbitrage back if we drive it away. Type-in traffic operators are more elusive. They have the pure traffic and we want to continue to provide a platform where it is appreciated.</p>
<p>Speaking of platforms &#8211; our DomainNameSales.com platform is chugging along and doing a terrific job brokering and handling sales inquiries for our clients, without charge. I continue to generate more revenue from that machine than I do from all my traffic sales. I strongly encourage each of you to embrace it, as I have. The version I use is no different than yours. I expect within less than a year, the time you spend investing in this platform will result in you turning more deals – and at greater prices than in your previous years. InternetTraffic.com’s parking program will continue to pay more than other PPC shops, but it is our goal to unlock the latent value of domain name portfolios by closing more sales, at higher dollar volumes, more consistently, than other sales platforms. I am so impressed by our site’s utility that I think, in 12 months, it will likely be the main reason that clients beat a path to our door.</p>
<p>Creating a great sales machine, unlocking the value of names and traffic, opening that platform for free to the masses – this may all sound very altruistic and too good to be true. But the cold truth is that I am doing this for me. If Jonathan Hart and my friend Pascal have taught me anything, it’s that I’m not getting any younger. I have a great deal of name inventory and it is my goal to unlock the value of those assets before Haley’s Comet graces the night sky above Lyford Cay again. If delivering a great product ultimately helps you to do the same for yourself, then all the better.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://internettraffic.com" target="_blank"><br />
<strong><em>Reprinted with Permission of Frank Schilling, InternetTraffic.com</em></strong><br />
<img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/internettraffic.com.jpg" border="0" alt="Go-here for internettraffic.com website"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/hart-to-hart-by-frank-schilling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T.R.A.F.F.I.C. auction domain sales were dismal</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/t-r-a-f-f-i-c-auction-domain-sales-were-dismal/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/t-r-a-f-f-i-c-auction-domain-sales-were-dismal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Auctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T.R.A.F.F.I.C. auction sales were dismal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recently concluded T.R.A.F.F.I.C. conference auction sales results were dismal!</p>
<p>Just reviewed some feedback and stats from the TRAFFIC domain auction and they are extremely dismal and disappointing to say the least.</p>
<p>Apparently there were few bidders there (some in attendance said the room looked empty) and sales were very low with just 240k sold, even after all the promo and hype (which has been ongoing for months). It was also odd for names as low as $200 selling, which lower quality names I was not aware could be listed at TRAFFIC conferences.</p>
<p>The fact online auction bidding was not allowed was no doubt a big negative and quite ironic and surprising since they are selling Internet names but at the same time contrarily not wanting to do that using the Internet as a venue to supplement the in-person bidding! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/t-r-a-f-f-i-c-auction-domain-sales-were-dismal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody on The Road… Nobody on The Beach…</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/nobody-on-the-road%e2%80%a6-nobody-on-the-beach%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/nobody-on-the-road%e2%80%a6-nobody-on-the-beach%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs and Forums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodities Futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Name PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domaining Related Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold & Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic & Revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website & Domain Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Traffic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gold will be 3500 - 6000 an ounce in a few years – either that or it will stay at 2000 and the DOW will fall to 5000. You can diarize that remark as you did my last. Gold of course is just another human behavior which men fight at their peril]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Written by Frank Schilling</em></strong></p>
<p>There is something about the end of summer that feels so very similar every year. The end of summer, of fun and frivolity always comes at the same time and echoes, like the lyrics from a Don Henley song. Aptly named “Labor Day” is like a starter’s pistol at a collective social race that has been programmed to begin through years of grade-school, college and university. Everyone around the world does it. Fighting the urge to be productive in September is like swimming against an unstoppable tide of human behavior.</p>
<p>A different more fearful tide of behavior continues to play out before us. People have come to the realization that the economies of the World are poised to get worse before they get better. Apparently printing more money to paper-over problems doesn’t work! I certainly believe that to be the case. Much of our economy today is powered by the Ponzi-scheme of government dollars recycled to the private sector, then recycled back to government. We have America, Greece, Portugal, Spain and others on food stamps. There are 20 million people in the US working for the Government, basically paying no tax. A government employee’s tax bill is just a return of cash back to those productive members of society who gave it to them in the first place. We have millions more on government social security and Medicare &#8211; all draining the system &#8211; taking more than they contribute. This is playing out in Europe, in America… everywhere.</p>
<p>I believe the US is facing difficulties, orders of magnitude greater than its recent financial downgrade. I noticed it in Malibu of all places, where for the first time I saw not only a dead-head sticker on a Cadillac, but also men, holding signs, begging for cash, at Cross-Creek and PCH (a celebrity studded shopping district North of LA)! There were many more regular-looking people and even women standing on corners throughout Los Angeles (not just the usual corners) with “need-help” signs in hand. The usual corners near freeway ramps had many more people standing on them, begging. Storefronts were closed and some stores had downsized even on Rodeo Drive. </p>
<p>here is a strange inflation and parallel deflation occurring. Certain people are charging more for goods and services and chalking it up to inflation, while earnings fall or disappear for the industry in which they participate. Millions of people like you and I have not come to terms with the difficulty ahead, wrongly thinking things will soon get better. There is a great re-organization upon us where whole industries are going away. Cash is being printed by governments to prop up unsustainable routines which just shouldn’t exist anymore. The no-confidence vote of the world’s productive members of society is reflected in the price of gold which has soared since I suggested you buy some back in 2004. Those who followed my lead nearly quintupled their money.</p>
<p>Gold will be 3500 &#8211; 6000 an ounce in a few years – either that or it will stay at 2000 and the DOW will fall to 5000. You can diarize that remark as you did my last. Gold of course is just another human behavior which men fight at their peril. Just a shiny metal without an intrinsic use… just like the tide of back to school, back to work mindset&#8230; and just like the rush for .com names which work just as well as .nets .info’s and .whateveryouwant. To return things to a domain context, no amount of new TLD’s are going to diminish the value of the human behavior gold standard &#8211; .com .. used.cars will not knock 20k in value off usedcars.com. It will increase the value of usedcars.com and set a permanent floor to its value. Make those words as you did my gold remarks in 2004, fight them at your peril.</p>
<p>Millions will be made and lost in the New TLD casino, on both sides of the table. We are creating a machine to enrich strangers, with a nebulous and unknown outcome for the participant. Most at the table agree it’s better to have tried and lost than to never have tried at all. I am not 100% sure I have the right answer for you, but it could be that the biggest winners at the new TLD table are those who buy the best SLD’s in each space. One recurring theme of all namespaces is that a TLD is only as good as the best SLD’s in it. If you buy the best second level names in each space you can do better than the registry itself. The .COM space is a good example. The top 10 million generic domain names in .com are worth more than Verisign. Only 5-10% of all the names registered in .COM are generic or meaningful in any way whatsoever. </p>
<p>Newer spaces such as .INFO have seen even fewer good names with perhaps 1% of the .INFO space being worthwhile to anyone whatsoever. I could see just a few thousand good names per string in almost all new TLDs &#8211; a collective few million worth anything whatsoever to anyone.. and the demand fall-off being almost TOTAL after that.. Unlike .com which has “some” low dollar demand for $250 multiword strings, there will be ZERO demand for longer strings in new extensions. Better to be the registrant of the best SLDs than to embrace the clerical misery and competitive marketing-hell of running the registry itself. Only the deepest pocketed and most brave should walk down this college fraternity hazing gauntlet or roll the dice at this table of monsterous uncertainty.</p>
<p>The Internet Traffic business is at its annual low as I write these words. People are gone fishing and the economy’s ad dollars sit on the shelf in-wait, soon to be applied to dormant adwords accounts. The back to school rush will see millions of new, refurbished and toolbar-free laptops fire up in unison. Type-in traffic will spike. Ad dollars will spike. We will build to a crest through January, propelled higher by the Black-Friday shopping season. It all kicks off with Labor Day and we will be there soon enough.</p>
<p>My hope is that the upstream ad-marketplaces (Yahoo and Google) will redistribute those returning dollars, pari-pasu, to the “partners” in the syndication engine-room, who are helping to move the ship forward. If they decide to skim off the top to “make their quarter” at the expense of those assisting below, I see genuine discord for the ad-marketplaces and difficulty keeping traffic next year. Like an abused spouse, Tina is two blows from stepping out of the limo and walking away from Ike once and for all. If the upstreams reap all the returning autumn gains at the syndication channel’s expense, I see platform abandonment ahead. I’ve heard it from too many partners and in too many quarters for this not to be the case.</p>
<p>More than in previous years, this is a season to be the squirrel – to gather nuts for the cold winter ahead. It’s a great autumn to “take the deal” and build a cash cushion to see you through in case this winter and the economy are colder than in previous years. I am advocating that all our partners save more of their earnings and build as big a cushion as they can muster. Higher renewal fees for .com names in January will bring discontentment in February as registrant margins get squeezed. Upstream partners will need to recalibrate their payouts to those partners doing the lifting downstream to compensate for the name renewal price increases, or risk losing their partners to alternative and unorthodox monetization implementations promising more revenues.</p>
<p>I expect that “pressure to pay more” on upstream ad markets will intensify because of the new TLD process. That process will put negative pressure on existing SLD name sales, which have been a crutch for low PPC rates over the past 2 years. Early next year, name buyers will wrongly question the value of existing .com/.net names against a barrage of press extolling the virtues and vices of new TLDs. The trifecta of a more difficult economy, lower traffic revenues from the Verisign price increase and lower name-sales due to the sideshow of the new-tld process will cause pressure on re-sales. It would be an Orwellian Animal-Farm moment to see Google and Yahoo crushing the numbers this February as the domain-industry plays the role of the horse in the engine room, turning the wheel for less and less revenue. I just don’t see that working any longer. So the takeaway for you all is to sell more of everything NOW and save it, then have that cushion so you can buy some courage to change partners or try unorthodox methods if you need to next March.</p>
<p>Despite that gloomy prognostication of what could come I remain hopeful that we have seen the collective low for traffic payments in 2011. The market and fixed expense reality simply dictates that type-in-traffic is worth more, and it is not equitable that any middleman takes a majority of a product which is produced. There are flat-rate shops buying traffic at higher levels. Walmart is a buyer. Target is buying traffic directly during the Black-Friday period. It’s a short curve of logic for those monster retailers to buy that traffic all year long. Walmart buys everything from Sundried Cranberry snacks and Garden hose directly through their buying center in Bentonville. I have been there and have seen that process in-action when I sold Walmart video game joysticks and gamepads 15 years ago. It is illogical that domainers wouldn’t eventually line-up at this same location with blocks of tens or hundreds of millions of unique monthly visits, if the existing paid-search marketplaces get so greedy that the model of selling to those marketplaces becomes unsustainable.</p>
<p>In the end, the method which we use to implement domain name type-in traffic is not under our control. Upstream traffic marketplaces need to decide how much volatility they want to tolerate in their keyword marketplaces and how much value they ascribe to it. A healthy channel simply dictates that those who generate the traffic, need to ride along in the success, otherwise the market becomes volatile and ultimately, undone.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://internettraffic.com" target="_blank"><br />
<strong><em>Reprinted with Permission of Frank Schilling, InternetTraffic.com</em></strong><br />
<img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/nobodyonthebeach.jpg" border="0" alt="Go-here for internettraffic.com website"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/nobody-on-the-road%e2%80%a6-nobody-on-the-beach%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low Price .US Domains are Getting Flipped a Lot</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/low-price-us-domains-are-getting-flipped-a-lot/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/low-price-us-domains-are-getting-flipped-a-lot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Flipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new domain extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[been quite interesting watching most if not all of that group sold, resold, resold, resold and sold again on the domain name forums between domainers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over a year ago we decided to let expire more than 50 mostly bad or dubious value letter dot-us names that we had been holding since as long as the year 2002 when most of them were acquired. We dropped them due to no traffic or income, plus poor acronym use potential.</p>
<p>It has been quite interesting watching the majority if not all of that group sold, resold, resold, resold and sold again on the domain name forums between domainers.</p>
<p>The sale prices are mostly between say $5 to $20. What makes it even more interesting is what with the low prices I don&#8217;t see how the domainers are flipping them for a profit and if they are making some money doing that it would not seem to be worth all the time and effort involved. It seems there is no end in sight as I again see many of them posted for sale again on the forums by their latest owners.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://CertificateOfAuthenticity.co" target="_blank"><img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/dot-us-domains.jpg" border="0" alt="Certificate of authenticity sponsoring site"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/low-price-us-domains-are-getting-flipped-a-lot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traffic/Revenue Doesn&#8217;t Matter in High Value Sales</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/trafficrevenue-does-not-matter-in-high-end-domain-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/trafficrevenue-does-not-matter-in-high-end-domain-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains/Websites for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic & Revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website & Domain Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Traffic Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[at Flippa.com it seems buyers place great value on website traffic and revenue stats, with little if any intrinsic value for the domain-name itself?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question we have always wondered about is why at Flippa.com it seems buyers place great value on website traffic and revenue stats, with little if any intrinsic value for the domain-name itself?</p>
<p>However, with the just announced big sale by Rick Schwartz (DomainKing) for 4 million dollars plus stock for the two domains property.com and properties.com, their traffic and income was in all likelihood not a factor in the sale. </p>
<p>In fact, that issue was probably not even discussed, let alone a real consideration with the offer and purchase. Obviously, properties.com and property.com traffic/income was insignificant vs the very high sale price. </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://trafficqualityadvocate.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/traffic-analysis.jpg"  border="0" alt="Go-here for traffic quality advocate"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/trafficrevenue-does-not-matter-in-high-end-domain-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Property.com/Properties.com vs Buying a New TLD</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/comparing-property-comproperties-com-vs-new-tlds/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/comparing-property-comproperties-com-vs-new-tlds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adminst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new domain extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website & Domain Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparing name extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name pries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new tlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reported domain sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking News: Rick Schwartz sells Property.com &#038; Properties.com for $4 million plus stock. Of course, congrats to Rick on his latest amazing domain sales. That great domain name sale got me seriously thinking about something I have been dwelling on for a long time, which is the potential impact of the new gtlds, which will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Breaking News:</strong> Rick Schwartz sells Property.com &#038; Properties.com for $4 million plus stock. Of course, congrats to Rick on his latest amazing domain sales.</p>
<p>That great domain name sale got me seriously thinking about something I have been dwelling on for a long time, which is the potential impact of the new gtlds, which will be coming online as soon as 2012. </p>
<p>What I mean by that is that since the .property and .properties tld extensions can be purchased for $185,000 each (plus other fees and expenses) it makes the 185k cost look like a great bargain (at least to me), compared to spending millions on the dot-com domains.</p>
<p>Think about this for a minute, would you prefer to own property.com at a cost of a few million dollars, or buy your very own &#8216;property&#8217; extension for less than 10% of the dot-com price? At this time, some of you may say property.com is best but I feel that view is mostly because so few realize the great impact the new extensions will have in the future. In fact, I predict they will eventually dominate over other tld extensions.</p>
<p>A reason I say that is I am sure most all large and possibly mid-size corporations (maybe even some wealthy individuals) will buy their own extension. After a while I feel it is likely they will decide to brand under their own extension instead of the dot-com.  </p>
<p>For example, assuming Ford buys .ford and also owns ford.com, don&#8217;t you believe one day they will switch their online brand to .ford and simply redirect ford.com to .ford? Keep in mind, dot-ford should be able to resolve stand-alone, depending on the server dns setup, so you can just typein &#8220;ford&#8221; to your browser and it will resolve. Same is true for &#8220;property&#8221; and &#8220;properties.&#8221;</p>
<p>So again, why spend millions buying the dot-com when you can buy the word without the .com to the right of the dot for 185k? Also, keep in mind, that cost is expected to drop sharply in a few years, well below 185k.</p>
<p>An excellent example of the benefit of going right-of-the-dot vs left-of-the-dot is the acronym domain-name &#8220;POS.COM&#8221; (a somewhat obscure acronym intended to mean &#8220;Point Of Sale&#8221;) which has me wondering why anyone today would offer almost a million dollars for pos.com when for &#8220;only&#8221; 185k they can as an alternative possibly purchase the .POS extension. </p>
<p>Another example is cars.net which sold for a staggering $170,000 last month according to dnjournal.com. The reason I say &#8216;staggering&#8217; is since it&#8217;s a .net extension it will lose a good share of its traffic to .com from typeins. That&#8217;s a big reason dot-net is considered to be such a poor choice for a business and branding is difficult. </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it make much more sense for the buyer of cars.net to spend just 10% more and apply for the &#8216;cars&#8217; tld? Can you imagine the powerful value of owning .cars tld vs cars.net! There really is no comparison when you consider how a business could easily brand themselves as &#8216;cars&#8217; and tell everyone just typein the word &#8216;cars&#8217; (and forget about adding .com or .net).</p>
<p>One more example is &#8220;StockBrokers.com&#8221; that recently sold for $185,000, which by coincidence is the exact same price as buying .stockbrokers extension. </p>
<p>Think seriously about this, wouldn&#8217;t you really prefer to tell websurfers to just typein &#8220;stockbrokers&#8221; to reach your website vs the longer &#8220;stockbrokers.com&#8221;  There are many other examples where the cost of buying their own tld extension would have a lower cost vs buying the high-priced dot-com domain, and also make more sense for overall branding purposes. </p>
<p>As a cool monetary benefit, and option, you will also be able to sell to the left-of-the-dot names for extra income to enable other brokers to buy a domain such as TopBroker.StockBrokers.com, for example, plus you can sell unlimited numbers of other domains to the left-of-the-dot since you own the right-of-the-dot. Isn&#8217;t that interesting!</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://freemlslisting.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/property-sold.jpg" border="0" alt="Click-here to list your property on the-MLS for a flat-fee"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/comparing-property-comproperties-com-vs-new-tlds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Category defining: CorporateCommunications.com</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/category-defining-name-corporatecommunications-com/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/category-defining-name-corporatecommunications-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adminst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Registrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains/Websites for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website for sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=3006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The category defining name If you are in the corporate communications business...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The category defining name to own if you are in the corporate communications business. Owned since 1999. Sharp price reduction: For more details and to possibly buy or make an offer please click-on the picture below&#8230;</p>
<p>This name was verbally valued at approxiamtely 500k to 600k by a domain broker in 2009 who now works as a broker for a major domain firm.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://t.co/kUjsuvN" target="_blank"><img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/corporatecommunications-logo.png" alt="Corporate Communications auction is here"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/category-defining-name-corporatecommunications-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RunningShoes.com: from $150 to 700k in 5 yrs</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/runningshoes-com-from-150-to-700k-in-5-yrs/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/runningshoes-com-from-150-to-700k-in-5-yrs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reported domain sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=2902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RunningShoes.com goes from a low 3 figure sale to high 6 figures sale!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNjournal.com reports that RunningShoes.com sold for $700,000 making it the year&#8217;s biggest sale. </p>
<p>To add to the news reported by Ron Jackson, this blog can report the domain name sold for a measly $150 in 2005. Isn&#8217;t that amazing! </p>
<p align="center"> <a href="http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/domainsales/2011/20110504.htm" target="_blank"><br />
<img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/running-shoes.jpg" alt="Click to visit Ron Jackson's DNjournal.com"></p>
<p align="center"> <strong>From low 3 figures to high 6 figures!</strong> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/runningshoes-com-from-150-to-700k-in-5-yrs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Recently Discovered Quality Domaining Site</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/a-recently-discovered-quality-domaining-site/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/a-recently-discovered-quality-domaining-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domaining Related Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=2813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just finished listening to the new DomainSherpa.com interview with well-known domainer Justin Godfrey. Just in case you are not familiar with DomainSherpa.com it&#8217;s a relatively new site operated by Michael Cyger. I have spoken to Michael and listened to his informative and educational series of interviews. By the way, Michael has excellent interviewing skills. His [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished listening to the new <a href="http://DomainSherpa.com"> DomainSherpa.com</a> interview with well-known domainer Justin Godfrey. Just in case you are not familiar with DomainSherpa.com it&#8217;s a relatively new site operated by Michael Cyger. I have spoken to Michael and listened to his informative and educational series of interviews. </p>
<p>By the way, Michael has excellent interviewing skills. His interviews also benefit nicely from their length since they are 1-hour or longer which time allows Michael and his guest to cover a lot of information in that time (compared to much shorter Youtube videos).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also quite interesting how the video interviews are of such good video quality from a basic service which most of us probably already have on our computers. After seeing how good the split-screen videos are I asked Michael about the technology thinking he must be using a top-quality video production system and was surprised the video quality is from Skype.</p>
<p>The most interesting part of the latest one-hour plus interview was how Justin Godrey purchased the domain name  Snowmobilers.com for just $500. The name had an equally surprising low asking price of only $900 which Justin received in reply to his email. I doubt I would even bother try to get a better price as he did with that amazingly low initial asking price.</p>
<p>How is that possible when the name is likely worth so much (I would estimate at mid-5 figures or more). Justin was certainly lucky with that one. <strong>Why does that kind of luck never happen to me?</strong></p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://crosscountryskiing.mobi/" target="_blank"><br />
<img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/snowmobilers.jpg" alt="Snowmobiling and cross country skiing are popular winter sports"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/a-recently-discovered-quality-domaining-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Importance of Owning Your Desired Domain</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/importance-of-owning-your-desired-domain/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/importance-of-owning-your-desired-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adminst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains/Websites for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website & Domain Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=2572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domain names are extremely popular as far as owning a website with that name, and its potential use as a business presence, marketing venue, e-commerce site, blog, email address and for information and product marketing. Obviously, there is only one exact name which is truly your most desired domain name available or for-sale, making it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain names are extremely popular as far as owning a website with that name, and its potential use as a business presence, marketing venue, e-commerce site, blog, email address and for information and product marketing. Obviously, there is only one exact name which is truly your most desired domain name available or for-sale, making it unique. </p>
<p>You probably realize the high value of owning a good domain and you surely don&#8217;t want someone else using &#8220;your desired domain name&#8221; and getting visitors looking for the domain keywords, the exact search term, or its URL, which visitors could have gone to your website, right? Why in the world permit another potential buyer to acquire your most desired available domain-name of interest and allow competitors to get site visitors going to their site, which visits you could have received instead?</p>
<p>There are a number of businesses and people with interest in also buying and developing your most desired domain, with some potential domain name users being quite well known both on-the-web and in the offline world too, including individuals and small, mid-size and large business owners in various businesses. </p>
<p>For a real-time internet-search to see &#8220;your desired domain name&#8221; and its search-engine and web-page popularity of the exact search-term, please do a Google search and search on the keywords (wrapped in quotes for exact search-term results)  of your desired domain name (using spaces between words), consisting of your desired domain name (but without entering the domain name extension, i.e. .com .org etc). </p>
<p>As a side-note, it&#8217;s sometimes interesting to view the Google results when you combine the words without any spaces between the keywords. The results will be much lower vs using spaces but nevertheless it may be informative, especially if the number of search returns for the words without spaces are considerable. </p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://yourdesireddomain.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://domainbrokerageacquisitionservice.com/images/domain-extensions.jpg" align="center" alt="Your most desired domain name" width="500" height="100" border="0"><br /> Read about your most desired domain name</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/importance-of-owning-your-desired-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negativity by Paying Domain Broker Upfront Money</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/never-pay-a-domain-broker-upfront-money/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/never-pay-a-domain-broker-upfront-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain/Website Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains/Websites for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website & Domain Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=2388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know several of the domainers/brokers and can also suggest the following brokers/domainers, ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes domain name and website owners may wish to hire a domain brokerage to sell their names or websites. I can give you some good advice (gained via my personal hands-on experience) about that, including a warning about paying any upfront fees to the broker. </p>
<p>Keep in mind, once the domain-broker has your money a good degree of the incentive to work hard and sell your domain or website may be lost since the broker already has his/her money, regardless of the name selling or not selling. </p>
<p>One more potential negative occurrence is the once friendly relationship you had with the broker may quicky go away if there are any business or personal issues involved. That can easily happen as a result of the broker already having your paid in advance monies so he may decline to issue a refund if you are later unhappy with his work and perfomance. </p>
<p>More information about why you should never even think about paying a fee in advance to a broker (which we published over a year ago) as part of a post about the category defining premium domain names <a href="http://LiveApp.com"> LiveApp.com </a> plus <a href="http://LiveApp.com"> LiveApps.com </a> both being available for purchase, located here: <a href="http://davidgreen.com/liveapp-om-and-liveapps-com-premium-domains-for-sale.htm"> About Domain Broker and Live App domains for sale </a>. </p>
<p>A good article about domain brokers was recently published in Elliotsblog.com in which Elliot lists domain name brokers. I know several of the same domainers/brokers and can suggest the following domain brokers, which Elliot listed in his post:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.bigticketdomains.com" target="_blank">BigTicketDomains.com &#8211; Kevin Leto</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.differentinvestments.com/" target="_blank">DifferentInvestments.com &#8211; Justin Godfrey</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.domainbroker.com" target="_blank">DomainBroker.com &#8211; Rob Sequin</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.domainsformedia.com/" target="_blank">DomainsForMedia.com &#8211; Eric Rice</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mediaoptions.com" target="_blank">MediaOptions.com &#8211; Andrew Roesner</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nameconnect.com/" target="_blank">NameConnect.com &#8211; John Daly</a></li>
</ul>
<p>By the way, Webtrading also offers a domain brokerage service (mosty for our own websites but the brokerage service can also be used to buy domains belonging to other parties), which you can learn more about by clicking-on the image below. In addition, any comments you may have about selling domains and websites, or regarding domain brokers will be appreciated. </p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://domainbrokerageacquisitionservice.com/" target="_blank"><br />
<img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/handshake-broker-success.bmp" alt="Webtrading Domain Brokerage Service: Click Here"> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/never-pay-a-domain-broker-upfront-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What This Site is About: The Categories &amp; Subjects</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/what-ths-site-is-about-categories-subjects/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/what-ths-site-is-about-categories-subjects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 06:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adminst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodities Futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forex Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health & Beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health & Wellness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing & Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge is power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=2250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. <strong>Health and Wellness</strong>, Medical Conditions, Illness, Disease Prevention & Cures;
2. Commodity <strong>Trading</strong>, Forex, Daytrading, Futures Markets, Options, Stocks &#038; Investing;
3. Female <strong>Beauty</strong> &#038; Personal Care, Body and Skin Care, Female Names &#038; Accessories;
4. Site Development, SEO, <strong>Domains</strong>, Featured Sites, Domain/Website Buying & Selling;
5. <strong>Internet Marketing</strong>, Online Products and Services, Blogs &#038; Making Money on the Web;
6. Real Estate, Realtor, FSBO, Flat-Fee Multiple Listing Service &#038; Flat-Rate <strong>MLS Listings</strong>;
7. <strong>Business</strong>, Communications, Financial Services, Certificates, Gov, Geo &#038; Uncategorized;
8. Foods, Diet, Exercise, Sports, Entertainment, <strong>Lifestyle</strong>, Live Apps &#038; Social Networks;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of our site visitors may be wondering or asking what this website is about? We try to cover as many categories as possible instead of concentrating on just one subject as many blogs often do. Even though the categories we write about and cover are very broad we still manage to keep it within our own experience and knowledge base too.</p>
<p>At this time, there may not necessarily be targeted articles or comments about some of these subjects found within this blog, but with that said, we do run a diverse number of websites which are highly targeted to every keyword subject in each broad category. To locate the relevant sites with well targeted content about all the subjects, you can do a <a href="http://WebtradingNetwork.com/"> Webtrading Network search</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>These are the 8 broad keyword categories covered by this blog and the sites in our Webtrading Network, with a widely covered and featured subject in each category highlighted in bold:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Health and Wellness</strong>, Medical Conditions, Illness, Disease Prevention & Cures;<br />
2. Commodity <strong>Trading</strong>, Forex, Daytrading, Futures Markets, Options, Stocks &#038; Investing;<br />
3. Female <strong>Beauty</strong> &#038; Personal Care, Body and Skin Care, Female Names &#038; Accessories;<br />
4. Site Development, SEO, <strong>Domains</strong>, Featured Sites, Domain/Website Buying & Selling;<br />
5. <strong>Internet Marketing</strong>, Online Products and Services, Blogs &#038; Making Money on the Web;<br />
6. Real Estate, Realtor, FSBO, Flat-Fee Multiple Listing Service &#038; Flat-Rate <strong>MLS Listings</strong>;<br />
7. <strong>Business</strong>, Communications, Financial Service, Certificates, Gov, Geo &#038; Uncategorized;<br />
8. Foods, Diet, Exercise, Sports, Entertainment, <strong>Lifestyle</strong>, Live Apps &#038; Social Networks;</p>
<p><center><a href="http://davidgreen.com/"><img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/knowledge-on-more-subjects.jpg" width="250" height="360" border="0" alt="knowledge about lots of subjects"></a></center></p>
<p>Please contact us with any questions you may have or submit a short article (and get a free link to you) for publication if you have knowledge about any of the specific subjects within the eight general categories.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://webtradingnetwork.com/"><img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/webtradingnetwork-logo.jpg" alt="Search the Webtrading Network of developed websites"></a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/what-ths-site-is-about-categories-subjects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Priced Domain Name Pricing Model</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/high-priced-domain-name-pricing-model/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/high-priced-domain-name-pricing-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adminst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing & Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website & Domain Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website for sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=2195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[asking a very high price for low or moderate value domain names is used by both Marchex and Frank Schilling's Name Administration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of asking a very high price for low or moderate value domain names is used by both Marchex and Frank Schilling&#8217;s Name Administration. In the past I tried to buy a few names (which if they were my names would be asking under 1k) but Frank wanted a minimum of 8k firm or even more, and would not budge a bit or negotiate the price. </p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s their business decision and a business model they apparently are following. With that said, in view of the fact they do want to sell domains, we do not see how Marchex Inc or Frank Schilling could possibly be selling many domains since I feel their prices are even more than end-user domain values. </p>
<p>In addition, they make you jump through a bunch of hoops, stumbling blocks and complexities before you can even make an inquiry, making buying from NameAdmin even more unlikely vs if their pricing was more realistic or flexible.</p>
<p>We will appreciate any comments you have about Money Matters, which feedback we could also add to our web site as we are looking for money matters and monetary ideas to expand the web site. </p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://moneymatters.org"><img src="http://moneymatters.org/images/dollar-sign-on-dollar-bills.jpg" alt="It's your money and your money matters"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/high-priced-domain-name-pricing-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Inquiry Sounds Better vs Domain For Sale</title>
		<link>http://davidgreen.com/domain-inquiry-sounds-better-vs-domain-for-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://davidgreen.com/domain-inquiry-sounds-better-vs-domain-for-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adminst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Sales & Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing & Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website & Domain Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website for sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgreen.com/?p=1654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the best way to place a notice on your website that your domain name is for sale...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been talk on the forum boards about the best way to place a notice on your website that your domain name is for sale. Fabulous.com does a good job combining PPC ads with a domain for sale announcement page and developed a type of hybrid between a parked page and a sales page. With that said, &#8216;This Domain Name is For Sale&#8217; notice does a fairly good job of getting people to make offers, but there appears to be a better way.</p>
<p>That Fabulous page is a good approach but I would like it even more if the banner said &#8220;Domain Inquiry&#8221; since I believe &#8220;This Domain Name is For Sale&#8221; notice will detract from the the visitor experience and potential visits to your advertisers (at least to to a degree) since the page may have has less crediblity due to the site/domain being offered for sale. The words &#8220;Domain Inquiry&#8221; has a less obvious negative meaning to a web-surfer, imo.</p>
<p>Any reviews, comments or ideas you have about how to effectively and professionally sell Internet domain names or websites would be appreciated. Thank you.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://liveapp.com"><br />
<img src="http://davidgreen.com/images2/domain-inquiry-on-liveapp.com.jpg" width="650" height="550" border="0" alt="Search the Webtrading Network to find websites for sale using keywords: Click Here"> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davidgreen.com/domain-inquiry-sounds-better-vs-domain-for-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

